
Lately I've been seeing a TV commercial from Jack in the Box that I'm amazed hasn't been pulled off the air yet (yes, I'm easily amazed). For those of you in states that do not have a JITB, it's a fast food restaurant based in primarily Western states that runs funny, irreverent commercials featuring
"Jack", the company CEO, who happens to have a giant clown head.
The commercial opens late at night with a long-haired college-age guy pulling up in his van in the drive-thru lane at a Jack in the Box. He sits there in a daze trying to decide what to order when the "Jack" bobble-head on his dashboard turns into a miniature version of Jack the live-action spokesman. Jack launches into a pitch for the two-for-a-dollar tacos, and the guy asks Jack how many he should order. Jack looks at him knowingly (at least as knowingly as a guy in a giant clown head can look) and says "How about thirty?" The guy, who is clearly stoned, tries to hold in his giggles and says "That's just what I was thinkin'!"
Now, I'm sure that Jack in the Box is one of the late-night venues of choice for potheads with the munchies, but this is the first mainstream commercial I've seen that so glaringly markets specifically to this target audience. With its low prices, abundant food and late night drive thrus, I guess it's a natural. Perhaps the company figured that it was so "under the radar" that nobody except for stoners themselves would recognize that the main character is not merely a stupid hungry person, but is one of them.
What really got to me is not just that the main character is portrayed as under the influence of drugs, but that he's driving in that condition, as if it's normal and acceptable. Ironically, as I was surfing around trying to find a link to the commercial (which is apparently not online), I came across a posting on a site called
"Hack in the Box" that cites an
article from New Scientist:
Cannabis almost doubles the risk of fatal car crashes, according to a new study, though smoking the drug is still far less risky than drunk-driving, the researchers say. Stoned drivers were almost twice as likely to be involved in a fatal car crashes than abstemious drivers, according to a study of 10,748 fatal car crashes in France between 2001 and 2003. More than half of the drivers in the study themselves died as a result of their accidents and all the subjects were tested for drug and alcohol use after crashing.
But hey, gotta sell some tacos.
UPDATE (2/23/06): You can hear me being interviewed on San Francisco's KGO radio (810 AM) about this issue in this
mp3 file.
UPDATE (4/21/06): Thanks to Tad for sending me the
link to the streaming version of this ad.
UPDATE (2/20/07): See
post with update on protest against commercials.
...or I might be high right now and THAT'S why it all seems to make so much sense. Either way I like what Jack is telling me.
Alan
Perhaps your son's friend is just naturally high on life, but I think that most people who see that ad make the assumption that the character is stoned on something a little stronger than that. And even if, to give JITB the benefit of the doubt, they did not intend for him to appear to be under the influence, the fact that most viewers come to that conclusion is reason enough to pull it.
The fact is, JITB is marketting to stoners, but that's okay, so are most video games. JITB is just more open about it.
We old thirtysomething people don't want you youngsters to have any fun. I'm glad that you take precautions to be safe by not driving while stoned, but I don't think you can speak for all of your peers on that. I wouldn't have cared so much if the guy had been shown eating tacos while stoned in his parents' basement, but if they show him in his van, I think it's a safe bet that he would have driven to get to JITB. By showing that in the commercial, they are making it seem normal and acceptable.
By the way, is this commercial still being shown? I wrote about this almost a year ago and I still get tons of traffic searching for info on this commercial.
Blaze on. hah.
You get your statistics from a country that barely knows how to drive in the first place, then if thats bad enough the drink wine like fish then if thats not bad enough the whole European system of loose sex and drug acceptance...... OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE A HIGHER STATISTIC!!!
Hows about we quit trying to skew facts to make a point and compare apples to apples and get some statistics in the same country and for further accuracy you might try same age group and same state. Then I will believe the "facts".
peace
As time goes by, people have been relaxing their morals. And the world is more dangerous than ever. I use to be able to ride my bike for hours, play in the front yard, go to a park all without my parents when I was 8. I wouldn't think about letting my 12 year old go somewhere in public without adult supervision. I trust my daughter, I just don't trust the other idiots in this world.
So everyone who's against "having a little fun" is homophobic, Christian, and old farts? I think we have what's called "Morals". We hope and pray for a world that is safe.
So stoners, keep supporting "driving under the influence". I don't think that my sister-in-law that I never met would, because she died by someone who was driving under the influence.
The American Lung Assocation, Health Advocates Against Marijuana,(H.A.R.M.), several non-profit agencies and local PTAs are staging a sit-in at corporate headquarters to protest this commercial.
JITB promised viewers last fall they would stop airing this particular commercial. Yet it came back with the SuperBowl and is seen nightly on local channels.
Intersting, given JITB's own code of conduct:Interesting,considering Jack in the Box's own code of conduct (p. 4, 15, 16)
http://www.jackinthebox.com/investors/pdfs/codeofconduct.pdf
Contact JITB and let them know that drug use is not "humorous" as they claim.
Ms. Linda Lang, CEO Jack in the Box, 9330 Balboa Avenue, San Diego 92123, (858) 571-2121
You referrs to anyone fitting the profile. If you take offence, then yes I'm talking to you.
CB
I don't have a "It's right or wrong opinion" but there is a reason why they have won awards. They know how to push buttons.
Anyway, way to over react. The study was worded to be misleading. If it 'doubles your chances' of getting in an accident, that means little if your chances of getting in an accident under normal conditions was, say, 1%. A 2% chance is not very much, and as it says in the excerpt YOU posted for sensationalism, driving while high is no where near as dangerous as driving while intoxicated.
I am not saying I think people should drive around high...I've done it, yes, but it was only to get home. XD I didn't purposely leave my own house to get food. I know people that do, of course.
Getting old sure does make you narrow minded and prone to fits of over reaction, huh? I wonder if this is how you (and those freaking out in the responses) saw yourselves when you were younger.
comparing raping a girl and weed because they are both illegal is completely ridiculous
if people want to get high and eat jack in the box thats their decision. people dont need to start a oh im offended and lets start a protest because im 30 and i have nothing better to do